The history of open source software is filled with ideological battles, passionate activists, and landmark legal cases. One of the most influential figures in this history is Bruce Perens – a controversial yet impactful open source advocate. Although not a programmer himself, Perens shaped critical aspects of open source philosophy and licensing. His foresight helped pave the way for court enforceability of open source licenses. This established key legal standing for the open source model we know today.
Contents
Perens‘ Path to Open Source
Perens got his start in the 1980s as a technical writer and magazine publisher focusing on Unix systems. By the mid-1990s, he became a leader in the burgeoning "free software" movement spearheaded by Richard Stallman. However, Perens gravitated towards the thinking of Eric Raymond and others who preferred the "open source" term.
In 1998, Perens co-founded the Open Source Initiative (OSI) with Raymond. This marked a pivotal moment in the free software vs open source debate. Perens drafted the OSI‘s formative Open Source Definition, distilling the essential freedoms that defined open source software. His writings like "The Open Source Definition" and "The Open Source Initiative" also articulated the open source philosophy and goals to a wider audience.
Perens saw the "free software" term as problematic for commercial adoption. But he viewed Raymond‘s suggested "open source" label as business-friendly while still championing software freedom. This thinking became mainstream through OSI‘s advocacy. The Open Source Definition remains the gold standard for certifying true open source software projects.
Championing License Enforceability
However, Perens realized that a major risk for this new open source model was a lack of legal strength behind its licenses. Without enforceability in court, bad actors could freely exploit open source code without contributing back. This could seriously undermine collaborative development.
In his 1998 essay "For the Record…What is Linux?" and other writings, Perens argued that open source licenses must have mechanisms to be upheld in the legal system:
"What is needed to make Linux completely free is a reliable mechanism for enforcing its license…We need to legally ‘close off‘ those few remaining loopholes through which Linux code can still be co-opted."
Perens advocated for licenses like the GPL which combined source code sharing with an enforceable "copyleft" to protect community freedoms. This foresight around the need for legal standing was key to open source thriving long-term.
The Seminal Jacobsen v. Katzer Ruling
It took nearly a decade for an open source license court case to unfold. In 2006, open source developer Jacobsen sued proprietary model train software vendor Katzer for violating his Artistic License that Katzer had used. Katzer claimed that open source licenses were mere "intentions" rather than binding legal contracts.
The appeals court ultimately ruled that the Artistic license constituted an enforceable copyright license agreement. Violating its terms therefore meant copyright infringement, not just a breach of contract.
This established that open source licenses have legal teeth just like proprietary ones. The ramifications were massive, finally enshrining real consequences for violating OSS license terms.
Validating the Open Source Model
The Jacobsen case represented a seismic shift in establishing the legal validity and standing of open source licensing overall. Some effects included:
- Affirming the enforceability of copyleft provisions like those in the GPL requiring code contributions back to the community. This protected OSS collaborative norms.
- Solidifying open source licenses as taking precedence over later software patents. This shielded projects from predatory patent threats.
- Enabling new commercial activities around open source software, spurring adoption. Global open source revenues rose from $1.8 billion in 2006 to $8 billion by 2016.
- Discouraging bad faith efforts to circumvent or undermine open source license terms. This thwarted those looking to exploit OSS without reciprocating.
- Providing assurance to developers that their license terms would be upheld in court. This gave continuity to OSS contributions.
- Setting influential precedent for later significant cases like Oracle v. Google over Java and APIs.
Overall the Jacobsen case had monumental impact in legally fortifying the open source model. It built upon the foundation that advocates like Perens laid in establishing robust OSS licenses.
Perens‘ Lasting Influence
Throughout his career, Perens made significant impacts beyond open source licensing:
- Co-creating the Debian free software operating system and key tools like dpkg and apt-get
- Advocating for technology user rights as an original board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Campaigning extensively in areas like cryptography freedom and promoting ethical standards in computing
- Sounding early warnings about software dependencies and privacy concerns of cloud computing models
Perens was at times seen as a polarizing figure for his activist stances and willingness to ‘call out‘ firms and individuals on issues of ethics. However, his prescient conviction around enforceable open source licenses proved invaluable. The legal standing he championed became crucial to the growth of open source as a sustainable movement. When it comes to the history of open source‘s journey towards legitimacy, Bruce Perens played an integral role in enabling a big change.
