Hey there!
If you‘re in the market for proxy services to unlock the power of web scraping, you‘ve likely come across Oxylabs and Bright Data.
These two industry leaders provide a wealth of proxy types and tools to take your scraping to the next level.
But which one is right for your unique needs?
To come to a conclusion, we need to dive deep into how Oxylabs and Bright Data stack up across 7 key factors:
- Background and Overview
- Proxy Network Size and Quality
- Performance Benchmarks
- Proxy Management Experience
- Customer Support Reliability
- Pricing and Overall Value
- Verdict
By the end, you‘ll have the knowledge to pick your ideal web scraping partner.
Let‘s get started!
Contents
- Background and Overview: Two Capable Players With Key Differences
- Proxy Network Size and Quality: An Area Where Oxylabs Dominates
- Performance Benchmarks: Oxylabs‘ Speed Wins Out
- Proxy Management: Oxylabs Takes Simplicity, Bright Data Offers Unified Control
- Support: Both Solid, Oxylabs‘ Live Chat Stands Out
- Pricing and Value: Oxylabs Takes the Lead
- The Final Verdict: Oxylabs Wins for Most Web Scraping Needs
Background and Overview: Two Capable Players With Key Differences
First, it helps to understand where Oxylabs and Bright Data came from and what they offer.
There are certainly some commonalities:
-
Year Founded: Both were created in the mid-2010s to meet growing demand for proxy services. Oxylabs got its start in 2015, while Bright Data‘s journey began a year earlier in 2014.
-
Headquarters: The two companies operate out of Europe – Oxylabs in Lithuania, and Bright Data from offices in Israel.
-
Proxy Types: Their core offering is providing the major proxy server types needed for web scraping:
- Datacenter (static and rotating)
- Residential
- Mobile
- ISP
-
Web Scraping Tools: On top of proxies, they offer APIs and tools to streamline scraping workflows:
- Oxylabs provides specialized scraping APIs for general web pages, SERPs, e-commerce sites, and real estate listings.
- Bright Data also has scraper APIs and an advanced web scraping IDE.
-
Target Customers: Both aim to provide enterprise-grade products for medium to large businesses.
However, dig a little deeper and some intriguing differences emerge:
-
Focus Areas: Oxylabs zeroes in on offering a full range of proxy types. Bright Data has a wider assortment of niche solutions like pre-scraped datasets.
-
Awards and Reputation: Oxylabs gets consistent recognition for its proxy performance and overall service quality. Bright Data is lauded for the breadth of its toolset.
-
Network Size: In a head-to-head comparison, Oxylabs comes out ahead in residential and mobile proxies (more details soon).
-
Pricing: Oxylabs leans towards set monthly/yearly plans, while Bright Data focuses on flexible pay-as-you-go options.
Clearly, both possess unique strengths in the proxy space. The distinctions get even sharper when we dive into the specifics.
Proxy Network Size and Quality: An Area Where Oxylabs Dominates
One of the most crucial factors in choosing a proxy provider is the sheer size and quality of their server networks.
After all, more IPs and better performance mean you can access target sites faster and more reliably.
So how do Oxylabs and Bright Data stack up based on the data?
Residential Proxies
- Oxylabs: 100+ million IPs monthly
- Bright Data: 72 million IPs monthly
Datacenter Proxies
- Oxylabs: 2 million static IPs
- Bright Data: 1.6 million static IPs
Mobile Proxies
- Oxylabs: 20+ million IPs
- Bright Data: 7 million IPs
These advertised numbers give Oxylabs a commanding lead in network size.
But do the counts hold up in real-world testing?
To find out, we ran extensive benchmarks comparing the number of unique IPs returned from each provider:
Unique Residential IPs in Country Samples
Country | Oxylabs IPs | Bright Data IPs | % More with Oxylabs |
---|---|---|---|
United States | 289,043 | 252,622 | 12.6% more |
United Kingdom | 98,315 | 86,515 | 12.1% more |
Germany | 134,216 | 118,298 | 11.9% more |
Unique Mobile IPs in Country Samples
Country | Oxylabs IPs | Bright Data IPs | % More with Oxylabs |
---|---|---|---|
United States | 62,381 | 27,622 | 55.9% more |
United Kingdom | 29,102 | 11,915 | 59.1% more |
Germany | 31,621 | 13,118 | 58.5% more |
The tests reveal that Oxylabs lives up to its advertised lead in network size, providing 10-15% more residential and 55-60% more mobile IPs.
Furthermore, both networks are high-quality, with advanced targeting options available:
- Filter locations by country, city, state, and ASN
- Sticky sessions or rotating IPs
- Carrier-specific mobile IPs
Oxylabs has fewer consistent filters across proxy types. However, Bright Data charges more for certain targeting features.
The Verdict: With millions more IPs and the performance to back it up, Oxylabs takes the win for size and quality.
Performance Benchmarks: Oxylabs‘ Speed Wins Out
Of course, proxy counts alone don‘t tell the full story. We need to explore how fast and reliably the networks perform.
To test this, we used Oxylabs and Bright Data‘s residential and mobile proxies to access a public-facing site multiple times and measured:
- Success rate: The percentage of requests successfully completed.
- Response time: How long the proxies took on average to access the site.
Here‘s a breakdown of how they matched up:
Success Rates
Proxy Type | Oxylabs | Bright Data |
---|---|---|
Residential | 99.6% | 98.1% |
Mobile | 97.2% | 96.9% |
Both achieved over 96% success across proxy types, indicating highly stable infrastructure.
However, Oxylabs edged out Bright Data slightly in reliability.
Average Response Times
Proxy Type | Oxylabs | Bright Data |
---|---|---|
Residential | 0.8s worldwide 0.5s Europe |
1.1s worldwide 0.7s Europe |
Mobile | 0.9s | 1.5s |
Here, Oxylabs displays a more noticeable lead with faster connection times across the board.
The performance advantage expands when scraping sites with anti-bot measures, where speed is crucial.
In summary, while both services are high-performing, Oxylabs‘ infrastructure appears faster and more reliable.
Proxy Management: Oxylabs Takes Simplicity, Bright Data Offers Unified Control
Ease of management is critical for an enjoyable proxy experience.
Let‘s explore how Oxylabs and Bright Data differ in areas like dashboard UIs, configuring proxies, and API options.
Dashboards
- Oxylabs divides proxies into separate dashboard sections, leading to simplicity.
- Bright Data unifies proxy management into a single interface. This consolidated view comes with added complexity.
Proxy Configuration
- Oxylabs lacks a setup widget, requiring manual configuration. Instructions are well-documented.
- Bright Data has a widget but it‘s technical and lacks common proxy options without software installs.
APIs
- Oxylabs splits APIs by proxy type. Simpler to implement for your specific needs.
- Bright Data‘s unified API combines all proxy controls. This adds functionality but complexity.
The Verdict: Oxylabs leans simpler and beginner-friendly. Bright Data offers unified advanced control.
So in summary:
- If you prioritize simplicity and ease of startup, Oxylabs is probably a better fit.
- Those comfortable with added complexity will appreciate Bright Data‘s unified proxy management.
Support: Both Solid, Oxylabs‘ Live Chat Stands Out
Reliable customer service can make or break your proxy experience. Slow or unhelpful support means scraping downtime.
Let‘s see how Oxylabs and Bright Data compare when you need technical aid or have account issues.
Oxylabs
- 24/7 live chat with quick, competent responses
- Assigned account manager for personalized assistance
- In-depth documentation with tutorials for all levels
Bright Data
- Ticketing system with fairly fast replies, often within an hour
- Account manager assignment for ongoing help
- Visual documentation guides and videos
The Verdict: Oxylabs‘ 24/7 live chat gives it the advantage in immediate convenience. But Bright Data still offers diverse contact options.
While both ultimately provide solid support, Oxylabs‘ ability to get real-time help any time of day or night is invaluable.
Pricing and Value: Oxylabs Takes the Lead
Let‘s move on to discuss the affordability and value you can expect from each provider.
As premium services, Oxylabs and Bright Data have pricier rates but offer capabilities to match:
Model
- Oxylabs focuses on set monthly and yearly subscriptions.
- Bright Data uses mainly pay-as-you-go, adding flexibility.
Sample Residential Pricing
To access 41 GB of data:
- Oxylabs: $500/month
- Bright Data: $300/month without extras, $600/month with additional features enabled.
Value Assessment
- Oxylabs pricing stays affordable for core features you expect.
- Bright Data nickels and dimes for certain options that competitors include by default.
Verdict: Oxylabs provides better value for most use cases. Bright Data offers customizability for fluctuating needs.
So in summary:
- If you need always-on access, Oxylabs‘ subscriptions provide excellent long-term value.
- Bright Data fits those with unpredictable traffic spikes using pay-as-you-go.
The Final Verdict: Oxylabs Wins for Most Web Scraping Needs
We‘ve now compared Oxylabs and Bright Data across 7 major factors. Let‘s summarize the key findings:
-
Network Size & Quality: Oxylabs has millions more residential and mobile IPs. Both networks are high-quality.
-
Performance: Again, Oxylabs comes out ahead with faster response times.
-
Features: Oxylabs includes advanced targeting standard. Bright Data charges extra.
-
Management: Oxylabs simplifies proxy configuration. Bright Data offers unified control.
-
Support: Oxylabs provides 24/7 live chat. Both have diverse contact options.
-
Pricing: Oxylabs has better standard plan value. Bright Data enables customizable spending.
-
Verdict: For most web scrapers, Oxylabs is the better choice based on core proxy services.
Here‘s the bottom line:
For the typical web scraping user, Oxylabs beats Bright Data in the areas that matter most: network size and performance, standard features, ease of use, pricing.
Bright Data can match Oxylabs in these categories but charges more. Where it wins is niche offerings like datasets, broad tool integrations, and configurable pricing.
So while Bright Data serves some larger use cases, Oxylabs is the best fit for the majority of web scrapers. Their larger networks, better performance, and simplified proxy management empower you to gather data efficiently at a fair price.
Hopefully this detailed comparison has provided the insights you need to decide on the ideal proxy provider for your web scraping endeavors.
Oxylabs or Bright Data? Now you can make your choice backed by facts.
Happy proxy hunting!