Hey there! If you‘re considering Infatica for your project or business, you‘ve come to the right place. I‘ve extensively tested Infatica‘s residential proxies and can provide detailed insights as a veteran proxy reviewer.
In this guide, I‘ll analyze Infatica‘s key strengths and weaknesses to help you determine if it‘s the best provider for your specific needs. You‘ll also get an inside look at benchmark results and comparisons with leading competitors.
Let‘s dive in!
Contents
Overview of Infatica‘s Services
First, a quick rundown of what Infatica offers:
- Founded in 2019, based in Singapore but Russian-operated
- Sells residential, datacenter, and mobile proxies
- Offers specialty web scraping APIs
- Mainly targets businesses for web scraping and data collection
- Minimum payment of $15 for access
Infatica positions itself as an enterprise-grade provider with an ethical approach. It‘s transparent about how the residential IPs are collected through SDK partnerships. The company also claims to not resell IPs to multiple customers.
These ethical assurances are important in the often shady proxy world. While Infatica is still gaining trust as a new player, its efforts around compliance and transparency are admirable.
Now, let‘s analyze Infatica‘s main offering: residential proxies.
Diving Into Infatica‘s Residential Proxies
Infatica‘s global residential proxy network has these key features:
- Pool of 10 million IPs from 150+ countries
- Location targeting down to city and ASN level
- Rotation settings from per request to 60 minute sessions
- SOCKS5 protocol support (with limited ports)
- Pricing from $96/month for 6GB
With 10 million IPs, Infatica has strong scale for a mid-level provider. The location targeting flexibility stands out too – you can dial in proxies to a specific US state or city for fine-tuned results.
However, Infatica uses a strict subscription model for now. You can‘t pay-as-you-go or top-up mid-cycle like on services such as Oxylabs.
To better evaluate the residential proxies, I‘ll share performance benchmarks from weeks of in-depth testing.
My Performance Benchmarks
I ran a series of tests over 3 weeks from a Germany-based server to measure three vital performance metrics:
Pool Size and Composition
First, I analyzed the overall size and residential make-up of Infatica‘s proxy pools:
| Gateway | Unique IPs | Residential % |
| Random | 455,228 | 93.02% |
| United States | 41,140 | 73.10% |
| United Kingdom | 17,636 | 73.41% |
The worldwide pool has great scale with over 450K unique IPs and 93% residential score.
On a country-level, the residential composition is lower but still decent for most uses. Do be aware that IP lookup databases tagged many IPs as datacenters, which could limit performance for some sites.
Infrastructure Performance
Next, I measured the overall speed and uptime of Infatica‘s proxy infrastructure:
| Gateway | Success Rate | Response Time |
| United States | 97.96% | 0.90 s |
| United Kingdom | 97.60% | 0.41 s |
The proxies demonstrated excellent speeds from European locations. However, success rates trailed top competitors slightly.
Performance Against Real Sites
Finally, I tested Infatica against some common proxy use cases:
| Website | Success Rate | Response Time |
| 95.21% | 1.65 s | |
| Amazon | 98.00% | 3.53 s |
The proxies provided consistent access to Google and Amazon, which was impressive given their advanced bot protections.
Based on these benchmarks, Infatica delivers very fast speeds and reliable site performance, especially from Europe. The overall success rates fall slightly short of competitors, but remain adequate for most use cases.
Using Infatica‘s Services
Now, let‘s discuss key parts of the Infatica user experience:
Getting Started
Registering an account is quick and only needs an email. However, you‘ll have to complete an identity verification process during your first purchase.
Dashboard Experience
Infatica‘s dashboard handles subscriptions and proxy management. It‘s fairly robust but also a bit fragmented – you‘ll be switching between services and proxy setup sections frequently.
Configuring Proxies
You can generate proxy lists through a widget or API tool. The widget offers more fine-tuned control over locations, rotation, etc.
Tracking Usage
Two basic usage graphs are available for total and timed data consumption. More detailed analytics would be useful.
Support and Documentation
Infatica provides 24/7 live chat and email support with a 4 hour SLA. The documentation covers account setup and basic API guides.
Lack of Automation
Unfortunately, Infatica currently has no API for managing proxies programmatically. This limits flexibility.
While Infatica‘s dashboard could use some UX polish, it offers all the core features you‘d expect. The lack of automation options is a shortcoming to note.
How Infatica Compares to the Competition
To better decide if Infatica is right for you, it helps to compare it thoroughly against alternatives:
BrightData
BrightData is the undisputed market leader in proxy services. The differences with Infatica:
- Much larger proxy pools with 100M+ IPs
- Pay-as-you-go billing available
- Additional features like static residential IPs
- More established reputation and partnerships
However, BrightData can cost hundreds more for heavy use cases. It‘s overkill for many basic proxy needs.
Smartproxy
Smartproxy occupies the affordable end of premium proxies:
- Pool sizes around 40M IPs
- Pay-as-you-go model with cheaper plans
- Specializes more in sneaker/retail proxies
- Less advanced targeting options
Smartproxy wins for flexibility and lower costs. But Infatica offers greater performance and targeting precision.
The Verdict?
Infatica isn‘t as fully featured as BrightData but exceeds Smartproxy in capabilities and performance. For large businesses that need reliable, targeted residential proxies, Infatica hits a nice middle ground.
The Final Word on Infatica
Let‘s summarize Infatica‘s key pros and cons:
Pros
- Very fast connection speeds
- Granular proxy targeting
- Consistent access to sites with heavy bot protection
- Competitive pricing at higher usage tiers
- Transparent operations and IP sourcing
Cons
- Pool size can‘t match the market giants
- Dashboard experience needs refinement
- Lack of pay-as-you-go billing
- No automation API yet
- Light usage analytics currently
Infatica delivers robust performance and competitive pricing in the residential proxy space. If you need reliable at-scale proxies for business purposes, Infatica absolutely warrants consideration alongside the market leaders.
For high-value accounts, try negotiating a custom plan and yearly contract for the best long-term value.
I hope this thorough review helps inform your decision process. Let me know if you have any other questions!
