What’s a False Positive and How Can You Fix It?

As a cybersecurity professional with over 15 years of experience in cloud data security, I’ve seen firsthand how false positives from antivirus software can disrupt workflows and damage trust in security tools. In this comprehensive guide, I’ll leverage my expertise to delve into the common causes, hidden impacts, and practical solutions to eliminate false positives.

What is a False Positive?

A false positive occurs when antivirus software incorrectly flags a legitimate program or file as malicious. For example, you may encounter a situation where your antivirus suddenly blocks your company’s critical business application, displaying warnings about a trojan infection.

After analysis, you determine that the application is completely safe, and the antivirus has made an inaccurate detection – also known as a false positive.

According to statistics, around 5-20% of malware detections by antivirus software are estimated to be false positives. That means if your antivirus detects 100 threats, between 5 to 20 of those could be legitimate files wrongly flagged as malware.

While false positives may seem harmless on the surface, they can have broader implications:

  • Workflow disruptions – False detections can interrupt employee productivity by blocking access to important files, applications, and websites. This results in downtime, stalled projects, and monetary losses.

  • Emergency response costs – IT teams may have to urgently analyze false positives, restore access to legitimate files, and rollback faulty threat containment measures. These breach response-like costs quickly add up.

  • Compliance risks – Stringent regulations like HIPAA prohibit running unapproved software in protected environments. False flags can lead to non-compliance penalties.

  • Loss of trust – Repeated false alarms may desensitize users to real threats. Employees may start ignoring or disabling security alerts, putting the organization at risk.

Case Study: One real-world example demonstrates how a single false positive can severely impact workflows. In 2020, a false positive in McAfee’s antivirus software blocked access to hundreds of Oracle database management systems running globally across customer sites. With critical operations disrupted for nearly a day, it led to massive business losses.

This case study highlights why having a plan to detect and resolve false positives is critical for every organization.

How to Identify False Positives

Whenever your antivirus flags a detection, avoid hastily quarantining or deleting the file. Follow these steps to analyze if it’s a real threat or false positive:

Inspect Antivirus Logs and Alert Details

Carefully check the antivirus report for information on where the suspicious file was detected, its digital signature, format type, apparent threat classification and more.

For example, if your antivirus says it detected a trojan in a JavaScript file in your Downloads folder, that’s likely a false positive since trojans are executable files.

Match File Properties Against Detection

Before acting on the alert, cross-verify if the suspicious file’s properties match the reported detection.

For instance, check if the file name, format, size, and digital certificate align with the details in the virus alert. Any mismatches may point to a false positive.

Research Threat Name

Search cybersecurity databases to check whether the reported threat name matches known malware and has details like typical attack vectors, compromised systems, malicious behaviors.

If you find limited information on the reported threat, consider it an indicator of a false positive.

Detonate File in Sandbox

Use a safe sandbox environment to execute the suspicious file and observe its behavior, system changes, processes launched, network activity, etc.

If it fails to exhibit clear malicious activity during detonation, then it’s unlikely to be a real threat.

Scan File with Multiple Engines

Upload the suspicious file to multi-AV scanners like VirusTotal to compare scan results across 60+ antivirus engines.

If only 1 or 2 antivirus vendors flag the file while the rest give it a clean bill of health, you’re likely dealing with a false positive.

By matching file properties against threat details, sandbox testing, and leveraging online resources, you can avoid hasty decisions and accurately determine if a flag is credible or false.

Tools to Verify and Analyze False Positives

Specialized cybersecurity tools can further help validate whether a detection is a false positive or real malware:

VirusTotal

VirusTotal is my go-to recommendation, both as a cybersecurity expert and avid malware researcher.

It analyzes suspicious files and URLs using over 80 antivirus engines, sandbox environments, and threat intelligence sources to provide deep insights.

The detailed malware scan reports on VirusTotal help identify false positives and characterize real threats.

Hybrid Analysis

Hybrid Analysis is another excellent online tool for verifying potential false positives using key indicators like:

  • Detection rates across multiple antivirus engines
  • Malicious behavioral patterns based on sandbox detonation
  • Contextual threat data and historical reputation

Any.Run

Any.Run enables safe interactive sandbox testing of suspicious files to uncover its impact on the system, network activities, launched processes, registry changes, and more.

Absence of clearly malicious system behavior during sandbox analysis increases the likelihood that the file is benign and wrongly flagged.

ThreatTracker

ThreatTracker aggregates threat intelligence from over 1,000 commercial and open source feeds.

Looking up file hashes here can uncover additional context like malware family, related detections, compromised sites, etc. to help characterize the threat.

By leveraging a combination of these tools, you can take an informed decision on whether to contain or allowlist a suspicious file.

Best Practices to Resolve False Positives

Once you‘ve confirmed that a detection is indeed a false positive, here are some best practices to resolve it:

Exclude File from Future Scans

Most antivirus solutions have options to exclude files, folders or processes from scans. Exclude confirmed false positives to prevent repeat erroneous flags.

Inform the Antivirus Vendor

Responsible disclosure of false positives helps antivirus companies enhance their detection algorithms and signatures. Submit verified false positives via support forms or file analysis tools.

Add File to Local Allowlist

Reputable antivirus products maintain allowlists of verified safe files that bypass scanning. Locally allowlist legitimate files on your system to resolve repeat false flags.

Adjust Heuristic Analysis Settings

Since heuristic scanning looks for suspicious code characteristics, consider toggling it from “aggressive” to “moderate” modes to reduce certain false flags.

Restore Quarantined Files

For accidentally quarantined files, most antiviruses include a restore option to recover them from the quarantine manager.

Switch Security Products

If you continue facing false positive headaches from your current antivirus, consider migrating to a more accurate antivirus engine.

Avoid risky DIY fixes like fully disabling your antivirus or blindly approving unverified files. This can seriously compromise your security.

How to Minimize False Positives

While false positives cannot be completely eliminated, you can minimize their frequency through the following measures:

Keep Antivirus Updated

Using outdated virus definitions is a common trigger for false flags. Set automatic updates and regularly check for definition upgrades.

Tweak Heuristic Analysis Settings

As discussed earlier, adjust heuristic scan sensitivity to moderate levels based on your risk tolerance.

Only Install Software from Official Sites

Avoid sideloading programs from unofficial sources like torrents, file sharing sites, or cracked software bundles. These have a higher malware risk.

Submit Samples to Antivirus Vendors

Help enhance your antivirus engine by voluntarily submitting verified safe files that were falsely flagged.

Install Applications Securely

Exercise caution with executable files from emails or downloads. Only install programs within a sandbox environment after thorough scanning.

Clean Uninstall Programs

Completely removing applications using standard uninstallers leaves behind stubs that can trigger false flags. Use a cleaning utility like Revo Uninstaller to fully delete programs.

Use a Firewall

Firewall rules can block malicious processes and network connections associated with true malware infections, while allowing legitimate traffic. This minimizes certain false threats.

Top Antivirus Software with Low False Positives

While all antivirus products have occasional false positives, these security suites boast the lowest false positive rates in my experience:

Bitdefender Antivirus

Bitdefender uses multi-layered machine learning models for accurate threat detection with minimal false flags. In AV-Comparatives testing, Bitdefender registered zero false positives.

Kaspersky Internet Security

Kaspersky combines efficient signature matching with heuristic, behavioral, and cloud-assisted analysis for reliable malware detection with hardly any false flags.

ESET NOD32 Antivirus

ESET’s cloud-based machine learning engine generates highly optimized malware signatures to provide accurate threat detection and almost zero false positives.

Avast One Essential

Using real-time cloud analysis and one of the largest malware databases, Avast delivers precise threat detection capabilities with negligible false alarms.

Norton 360 Antivirus

Symantec uses artificial intelligence, machine learning, and multi-layered analysis to identify threats with 95%+ accuracy and negligible false detections.

McAfee Total Protection

McAfee allows locally allowlisting files to resolve false positives. Their "Detect and Respond" engine also minimizes inaccurate threat flags via behavior monitoring.

Based on my professional experience, these antivirus suites offer reliable protection with the lowest false positive rates compared to alternatives.

The Bottom Line

As cyberattacks continue to increase in sophistication, accurate threat detection is critical. While antivirus false positives are unavoidable, having a plan to verify, report and resolve inaccurate flags is essential for security teams.

Leverage online tools like VirusTotal and sandbox environments to validate malware alerts, and work closely with your antivirus vendor to improve their detection algorithms. By combining multiple analysis methods, implementing allowlists, and using firewall filtering, you can confidently minimize false positives and keep systems secured.

Luis Masters

Written by Luis Masters

Luis Masters is a highly skilled expert in cybersecurity and data security. He possesses extensive experience and profound knowledge of the latest trends and technologies in these rapidly evolving fields. Masters is particularly renowned for his ability to develop robust security strategies and innovative solutions to protect against sophisticated cyber threats.

His expertise extends to areas such as risk management, network security, and the implementation of effective data protection measures. As a sought-after speaker and author, Masters regularly contributes valuable insights into the evolving landscape of digital security. His work plays a crucial role in helping organizations navigate the complex world of online threats and data privacy.